Monday 18 July 2011

I wanna brown baby....

There have been two women of note in the press in recent days.  One is the rather scary-looking Joanne Watson from the Channel Islands whose claim to fame is not just that she has 14 children but that she is already a Grandmother twice over and now her 15 year old daughter is proudly due to give birth later this year.  The other is Nadia Suleiman, the woman who became known as "Octomom" in the States after giving birth to 8 babies to rack her total up to 14 as well.  


Needless to say (and forgive me if I am beginning to sound like a grumpy old reactionary here) Ms Watson is providing for her brood by virtue of astoundingly generous state benefits to the tune of around £2000 a month.  Sorry - scrap that - YOU are providing for her brood.  When her daughter Mariah has her baby, she will move out of the family home and into a state-funded development for single mothers.  And what does Ms Watson have to say about such rampant irresponsibility?  Well, she pays lip service to the idea of using contraception but why would any of her kids do that when they have her as a role model?  She also admits to being jealous of her daughter because she would like yet another baby!  The reason?  She wants one with dark hair - all hers are blonde.  It would be hilarious if it weren't so tragic.  It reminded me of this, which you may remember from some years back.




Ms Suleiman also - despite insisting that she would support the ludicrous number of children  herself - is apparently living off the state because of a back injury she suffered at work some years ago.  Didn't stop her carrying 8 foetuses though, eh?  Er, and all of them created by IVF.  Incidentally, the doctor who implanted the final batch has now had his medical licence revoked. He clearly didn't embrace the mantra the The Only Way is Ethics. (sorry).

Far be it from me to deny anyone their biological imperative - who would want to live in a regime such as that inflicted by China on its people - one child policy, enforced abortions and sterilisation and punitive repercussions for those who break the law - but am I missing something here?  15 year old Mariah says that she doesn't want the father of her baby involved.  Well that's okay then because, by default, that means that you and I will have to be involved instead.  And what are the chances of the rest of the Watson brood following in their mother's and sisters' footsteps?  Ms Watson has given birth to many more girls than boys, so can we expect them shortly to become the biggest presence in Guernsey?  Maybe they could take over the whole of the island in their ever-increasing numbers?  


Before I ever had children (and had any clue about how much slog is involved) I used to dreamily think that I would like to have four.   Although I have a huge extended family (27 first cousins!) I only have one sibling and I used to be dead jealous of my cousins who had four, five, six kids in their families.  Then I had a wake up call.  Actually I had several - the first being a totally traumatic birth experience with our son, the second being sleepless in Surrey  for what felt like feckin' years and the third being the Shah's offer to leave home if I ever contemplated getting pregnant again after our daughter was born.  Actually, thinking about it.....


But leaving aside the moralising for now, the thing that has struck me most forcefully about the Watson situation (and Octomom as well, to an extent) is the calm acceptance displayed by all involved.  There is no defensive behaviour, no bravado, no bragging.  It is what it is - utterly normal and acceptable in their minds.  I must be getting old because I find myself open-mouthed in disbelief.  There is undoubtedly a long and deep discussion to be had on the psychological reasons that women such as these two behave as they do and it is one that I am not qualified to enter into.  And I guess I could proselytise forever but Ms Watson is unlikely to take notice and yes, she is probably the exception to the rule and there are millions of single parents who confine themselves to sensible numbers of children whom they can support via their own efforts, but all the same .....

15 comments:

  1. In the Sunday Times yesterday Rod Liddle suggested the family should be moved to an adjascent island and made to mate with puffins, "The amazing bird shagging women of Herm" and become a tourist attraction, thereby earning their keep!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mating With puffins is quite a repellent thought. I wonder what possessed him to say that? Mind you there will soon be so many Watsons marching around Guernsey perhaps the residents wi be hard pushed to tell the difference!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Poor Puffins is all I can say, has anyone actually checked if the puffins want to be part of that?

    Anyway.....so you're saying my life plan to have a baby of every shade, gender and flavour is not a good idea then?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hah Taz! I've already got a brown baby - two actually. I wonder if she'd like one of mine? For a small fee, of course. God knows I'd happily sell either of them
    Oat days :-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Damn you, autocorrect! That was meant to read MOST days... FFS *sighs with irritation*

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well thank goodness it is the taxes of the good people of Guernsey that pay for her, not us. Curious that the DM ran another story about her a few days ago, not another benefit scrouning scum one, but a wow, isn't it amazing she's PREGNANT again with No. 16 - and she's only 39 now. And back with the partner who apparently left her last year, who she only started seeing recently and got pregnant with within 3 weeks. Something not right with this story. They also ran another one about her size zero figure in 2007.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well fortunately it's not my taxes paying for her, it's the good people of Guernsey as they have their own system of taxation and benefits. There's something wrong with this story though. Why did the Mail run another story about her this week. Not another 'benefit scrounging scum' one but a 'Superwoman' who is still a size 0 one and guess what.... she's pregnant with no 16, which means she had another baby within a week because she only had 14 last week. The father of this one is the same man who supposedly left her last year yet she only started going out with him this June - and was pregnant 3 weeks later. No wonder her daughters don't know how to keep their legs together. There was no mention of her being pregnant in the last article. They also ran another story about her in 2007 where they congratulated her and her then husband for supporting their children themselves without handouts. I'm lost on this one!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bloody Hell, WG - you are a super sleuth! the bloody woman's probably paying them to place the articles in the Daily Mail. I shall have words with Mr W as soon as he is back from his road trip across the States (don't ask!)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bizarre too that there are so many women our there who just want one baby and aren't able to. This is a fascinating story...

    ReplyDelete
  10. oat days, most days it's all the same salad I mean difference ;)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jody - good point. People with fertility problems must be grinding their teeth when they read stories like this...

    Taz - you speak my language :-))

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh I'm late to this discussion - has anyone asked the Daily Mail for clarification? How could you possibly support 16 kids FFS financially or emotionally?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Macy, I think you have better things to worry about than the feckin' Daily Mail! But I think the answer is that she's not supporting them either financially or probably emotionally. She just keeps poppin' them out!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Oh don't get me started on this one......insert grinding of teeth noise here.......

    ReplyDelete
  15. You and me both Libby - you and me both...

    ReplyDelete

Oh go on - say something for God's sake...